Forster’s recent study of the charity sector reveals how corporate partnerships are being limited by cultural challenges and the over-emphasis on the bottom line. Although it sounds counter-intuitive to say that fundraisers should be looking beyond financial targets, we believe that doing so will help enable the cause behind the campaign to be better served.

When a partnership is brokered, the first question that most ask is how much money it is worth. The pitching process tends to centre on how the money will be used to address a particular cause. However, if a broader view is taken, and it is the issue rather than the money that is given centre stage, the discussion has a different dynamic. Perhaps the first question should more often be ‘how can we best work together to make a real difference’ not ‘how much money can we raise for the programme’.

The Age UK and John Lewis partnership is an interesting example. It has, without doubt, got people talking about loneliness in a way that they didn’t before. Not only have funds been raised but the issue has been catapulted into the national consciousness. Age UK and other organisations working with older people, such as Independent Age, have said that demand for their services has increased. This is to be commended. And no doubt there will be a long line of fundraisers pitching their causes for the 2016 partnership.

Keep the momentum going?

 

It’s a shame that the only product in the ‘Man on the Moon’ range that raises money is the mug. It is a pity that there is no noticeable presence for Age UK in store or online. However, the bigger question is whether for John Lewis, loneliness will just be for Christmas.

Once the last of the Christmas merchandise has been shipped from the depots, the new year sales have ceased and people steady themselves for the year ahead, what then for loneliness? How satisfying it would be if staff, stores and product are aligned to keep the momentum going – perhaps the tech teams could help people to get online; the in-store cafes be used for a range of social initiatives; and the staff could volunteer time to support programmes helping people to keep well through the coldest months of the year. This shouldn’t be a pipe-dream.

Better integration

Charities are currently caught between an urgent need to fundraise to support existing services and the desire to build longer term, solution-orientated partnerships for change. While the potential for corporate-charity collaboration is clear, the reality is often frustrating with the majority of relationships still based on passive giving from business to charity.

I believe the combination of better integration and collaboration, both across the charity’s external relations teams and with the corporate partner, will enable the common ground to be found and a partnership of equals to be formed. By doing this a partnership has the potential to go beyond raising cash and awareness, as useful as that is, and instead help achieve meaningful and long-term action.

A further article on the research is available from the Forster Communication website