Story

还没有用户? 现在注册。 这是免费的!

The Lausanne Global Conversation is on the World Wide Open Network

文章

Can we accept Transgender as a pastor in the church ministry?

作者: Gideon
日期: 02.07.2012
Category: 资源管理

评级 (0)
  • Currently 0.00/5
收藏夹 (0) 推荐

翻译

可用的翻译版本:

最初发表于英语

Can we accept and receive Transgender as a pastor of the church ministry?

Yes I do accept and receive the Transgender Pastor and support and encourage this move in the ministry with the following proofs.

Zechariah 12:1: "The LORD ... forms the spirit of man within him ..."

This implies that a person’s spirit is separate from their body. This leaves open the possibility that God occasionally makes the spirit and body of a person to be of different genders. If this is God’s intent, then it presumably should be respected.

1 Samuel 16:7:

"... The LORD sees not as man sees; for man looks on the outward appearance, but the LORD looks on the heart."

This could be interpreted as supporting the acceptance of transgenderism and transsexuality. The verse might imply that humans typically observe only a person’s physical appearance -- their genetic gender. On the other hand, God observes the person’s interior reality -- their perceived gender.

Psalms 139:13-14:

"For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knows right well."

This is a psalm of praise to God who wonderfully and marvellously formed the writer as a fetus in their mother’s womb. One’s genetic gender is determined at conception; many researchers believe that the brain’s gender identity is determined during gestation. This psalm thus appears to be confirmation that a transgender person/transsexual is exactly what God had in mind. Their Gender Identity Disorder (GID) is specifically designed, natural, and not an accident. Thus, it could be argued from this verse that persons with GID should be honoured and accepted as equal to.

For centuries it was part of our common intellectual heritage that the terms ’person’ and ‘living human being’ were virtually equivalent. In ancient Christian thought, the concept of “person” is an ontologically foundational concept – it cannot be defined in terms of more fundamental properties.  It is the nature which we as human beings share. 

The original Greek word for person (prosopon) means literally ’the face’, but in ancient Greek it also referred to the mask that actors used to represent the character they were playing in the theatre. In Greek and Roman thinking what mattered about an individual was the face they showed to the world, the role they played in society. We have retained this meaning when we refer to someone’s ’persona’. It is the public face they show to the world. It is interesting that this is how the word is used in the Greek New Testament. At several points God is described as one who shows no favouritism. The literal Greek says that he is not a respecter of persons, meaning that he is not influenced by our external and social role. 

However in Hebrews 1:3 the Son is described as the exact representation of God’s person and a different word is used, hypostasis, which literally means ’what lies under’. The early Church Fathers, as they reflected on the nature of the Godhead and the meaning of the Trinity, fastened on this word hypostasis to describe the three persons of the Trinity. God’s ultimate being (what ’lay under’ his activity), was in the form of persons - persons giving themselves to one another in love. And as human beings are made in God’s image, we too are created as persons. We reflect God’s nature in our personhood; we are created to give ourselves to God and to others in love.

关键词: Transgender

对话 发表评论

目前还没有评论。

你必须登录后才能发表评论。如果你还没有用户名,请在此注册(免费、易用!)。

到达地图和统计资料

 

观点: 1227
评论: 0
推荐: 0

点击开始行动

请把我和对资源感兴趣的人们连接起来:

使用条款 | 保密条款 | 洛桑全球对话(LGC)是由World Wide Open制作支持 | World Wide Open是什么?