Story

还没有用户? 现在注册。 这是免费的!

The Lausanne Global Conversation is on the World Wide Open Network

文章

From Collective Affirmations to Enduring Commitments: Lausanne Theology Discussion (2 of 7)

作者: Cody C. Lorance
日期: 03.10.2010
Category: 和好, 正直与谦卑, 合作关系

评级 (0)
  • Currently 0.00/5
收藏夹 (0) 推荐

翻译

可用的翻译版本:

最初发表于英语

Question #2 -- How do we really go about accomplishing something at Cape Town? How can we ensure that specific calls and charges and challenges that are made by speakers, presenters and others at the Congress translate into genuine and deep-seated  commitments that are held by most if not all the delegates?

----------

"The Whole Church Taking the Whole Gospel to the Whole World: Reflections of the Lausanne Theology Working Group" (full version) 

2. Regarding the "Whole Church"

The second section of the paper sets out answer "What is the Church?" Again, not a very easy thing to do, and yet, the answers provided are quite solid and helpful. I would like to highlight the subpoint on page 13-14 (full version) regarding the importance of recognizing several popular dichotomies as "false and damaging". I like this section and think it carries an important message for the Church.  However, I do want to point out that this desire to "move back behind" these dichotomies appears to be forgotten later in the paper.  In the epilogue of section three the paper is again setting up a dichotomy of "word and deed" which it specifically warned against previously (p. 33, item 1 in the long version).  That is admittedly frustrating for me to see because it gives me the feeling that the paper is not being presented in a fully univocal way -- which is particularly ironic given its emphasis on the wholeness of the Church.

Question #2 -- How do we really go about accomplishing something at Cape Town? How can we ensure that specific calls and charges and challenges that are made by speakers, presenters and others at the Congress translate into genuine and deep-seated  commitments that are held by most if not all the delegates?  I am very concerned that God will speak and issue many significant calls to His Church.  That we will agree to the truth and profundity of such calls. And that we will fly back into our respective fields of service only to be overwhelmed by the day-to-day concerns and local priorities of our ministries.  How do we truly get on the same page and commit ourselves to a shared vision, strategy, theological understanding, priorities, etc?  Or is this simply too much to ask?

可下载的附件

关键词: unity, theology, LTWG, church

对话 发表评论

自动翻译:
PhContributeBy
回复 标记 1 支持 反对 Pete_Houston (7)
南非

 "How do we really go about accomplishing something at Cape Town? How can we ensure that specific calls...translate into genuine and deep-seated  commitments...Or is this simply too much to ask?"  Probably very little can be done.  I sensed a sadness in Chris Wright’s reflection on previous Lausanne committments when he noted that some of the same issues are still the same issues!  

All the grandest calls at Lausanne conferences, global leadership summits, the highest levels of church governance, leadership/eldership councils comes to nought if is not internalised and owned by individuals.  

Ditto, our faith and personal salvation.


06.10.2010
PhContributeBy
回复 标记 0 支持 反对 Cody_Lorance (12)   
美国
@ Pete_Houston:

If only the Holy Spirit would come . . .


06.10.2010

你必须登录后才能发表评论。如果你还没有用户名,请在此注册(免费、易用!)。

美国

PhContributeBy Cody Lorance  
 
地点: Carol Stream
国家: 美国

查看成员


查看更多

到达地图和统计资料

 

观点: 4638
评论: 2
推荐: 0

点击开始行动

请把我和对资源感兴趣的人们连接起来:

加入相关的对话

The best kind of generosity is done with others, not for others
The best kind of generosity is done with others, not for others
作者 Sas_Conradie

Global Generosity Network May Newsletter
Global Generosity Network May Newsletter
作者 Sas_Conradie

International Church:  Some Unique Features or a Case of Simple Semantics
International Church: Some Unique Features or a Case of Simple Semantics
作者 gatheredscattered

 

使用条款 | 保密条款 | 洛桑全球对话(LGC)是由World Wide Open制作支持 | World Wide Open是什么?