Story

Don't have an account yet? Sign Up Now. It's free!

The Lausanne Global Conversation is on the World Wide Open Network

Cape Town 2010 Advance Paper

Reflections on the Hermeneutics and Practice of the Prosperity Gospel

Author: Femi B. Adeleye
Date: 20.07.2010
Category: Prosperity Gospel

Rate (5)
  • Currently 3.60/5
Favorite (3) Recommend

Translations

Available Translations:

Originally Posted in English

Editor’s Note: This Cape Town 2010 Advance Paper has been written by Femi Adeleye as an overview of the topic to be discussed at the Multiplex session on “Poverty, Prosperity and the Gospel.” Responses to this paper through the Lausanne Global Conversation will be fed back to the author and others to help shape their final presentations at the Congress.

Introduction

The ‘Prosperity’ or ‘health and wealth gospel’ which has also been referred to as the ‘Name it, claim it’ gospel, or ‘Gospel of greed’ is a rapidly growing emphasis within churches. The key emphasis is focus on material possessions and physical well-being. This may include financial resources, good health, promotion at work, success in examinations, success in business, success in any endeavour of life, or material well-being – as in good clothes, good housing, cars, etc., etc. It also includes victory over perceived enemies who may be responsible for one’s material lack of progress. The focus on material well-being and acquisition is often used as a sign of one’s approval or standing before God. The ‘health and wealth gospel’ cuts across denominational barriers and is more defined by its features and emphases.

1. The Hermeneutics of Offering Time in Some Churches

The time of offering or giving is often the defining moment for the prosperity gospel in many churches. In the past the central part of the worship hour or two was the proclamation of the Word. Today in many churches the centerpiece is now the ‘offering time’ and not a few churches have specially skilled and designated people to be masters of this significant ceremony. The popular saying is ‘Offering time is blessing time’, not least because for many it is viewed as investment time. It is often regarded as sowing time, which looks forward to significant returns. The Word itself is often twisted to back the centrality of offering time, and in some churches there is a mini-sermon to ‘urge’ the congregation to give. (1) However quite often there can be as many as five or six different collections taken in a single service. One cannot but feel a sense of the flock being fleeced bare.

From this writer’s observation the most popular verse used in motivating or mobilizing the congregation to give is Luke 6:38, which says, “Give, and it will be given to you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over will be put into your bosom. For with the same measure that you use, it will be measured back to you”.(2) This verse is quoted with relish and often backed by a mini-sermon on the benefits of giving. Its use, however, is often not faithful to the text or context. Its context is Jesus’ teaching on love and mercy and how we relate to and treat others.  The paragraph begins with “Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven”. (3) Following in God’s example, love and mercy should produce a hesitation in judging others, as believers realise that God will treat them in the same way they have treated others. The passage is therefore first and foremost about relationships – not treating others or judging them in the way we do not want to be judge – for in this regard, “with the same measure that we use, it will be measured back to us.”

Keywords: Prosperity, possessions, well-being, wealth, greed, offering, giving, Jim Baker, poverty, Luke 6:38, rich, poor, money, affluence

Conversation Post Comment

Auto-Translate:
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Sylvain_Allaboe (0)  
Togo

Nous nous réjouissons de cet article du frère Femi qui a su souligner les faiblesses de l’évangile de la prospérité et préconiser des voies pour faire face à la pauvreté criarde en Afrique. Nous voudrions seulement suggérer que les tenants de l’évangile de la prospérité utilisent aussi et surtout des textes de l’AT (par exemple: "tu ne sera pas la queue, mais la tête"; "toute terre que ton pied foulera je te la donnerai")qu’ils sortent de leur contexte pour soutenir leur prédication. ils ignorent royalement l’exigence qui accompagne l’union du disciple avec Christ: souffrir avec lui pour règner avec lui.

Quant aux approches de solutions face à la pauvreté en Afrique nous sggérons le développement d’une théologie pertinente du travail de l’implication sociale et publique de l’église.


21.07.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Femi_Adeleye (1)   
Ghana
@ Sylvain_Allaboe:

Merci Bien Sylvain. Your comments are welcome.


25.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down ChristineDillon (11)  
Taiwan (ROC)

Dear brother,

Thanks so much for your encouraging, gospel centred, God-glorifying article. I found myself saying "Yes" throughout and being encouraged to know that there is another who has not ’bowed the knee’ to a false god.

Again and again it comes through that the ’health/wealth’ gospel is able to flourish because of a poverty of good Bible teaching. By that I mean a teaching that covers whole sections in context and is balanced in covering ALL the Bible and not just the bits that we like.Thank-you for taking some of those ’favoured’ texts by health/wealth proponents and putting them in biblical context. 

I also particularly liked the comments from Bakker. There is hope for everyone who has been wrong. Praise God that there is hope even for me.

I look forward to attending this session in Cape Town and learning from brothers and sisters from the parts of the world I’m least familiar with (Africa and South America) as my life has been mostly Asia and west.


05.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Femi_Adeleye (1)   
Ghana
@ ChristineDillon:

Thanks Christine, your comments are grately appreciated. Look forward to seeing you in Cape Town. Blessings!


25.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Sharon_M (7)  
Singapore

Thank you so much for your insightful article.  Found it extremely helpful, especially the section on suggest defects of such a gospel.  It has certainly shed more light for me on the subject for me, in the light of the different forms that the Prosperity gospel manifests itself in my own country.


17.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Femi_Adeleye (1)   
Ghana
@ Sharon_M:

Hi Sharon, Thank you for your comments.


25.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Jim_Harries (-3)
Kenya

Thanks for your piece Femi. A few comments:

1. When you say: “It also includes victory over perceived enemies who may be responsible for one’s material lack of progress.” I presume you are referring to witches? It may be helpful to mention that much African churchmanship is about ‘tackling witches and witchcraft’. Knowing this helps to fill in some background to what otherwise seems strange – how did poor people get into this, kind of thing? For much of Africa, wealth comes by default unless witches and ghosts (spirits) prevent it, so ‘claiming it’ from God is merely claiming victory over witchcraft – with which I think less of us would argue, although probably even less would understand.

2. It is fascinating to think, while reading your piece, that in the ‘old days’ of course Temples were very much about money.

3. When you say that these days many people are turning to the church for ‘answers’, we also need to remember that the ‘ancestors’ (how to translate this word from African languages is not easy?) often have a major part to play in church life. For example, funerals are in parts of the continent key (or the key) events of a church, apart from the Sunday services. In a sense then ‘prosperity gospel’ is people going ‘back to’ their ancestors, in another sense the church is merely another way for people to reach their ancestors and to ask them for wealth, as has ‘always’ happened in Africa.

4. Whatever else we say … prosperity gospel does in a sense ‘work’, or so many people wouldn’t be following it. One way I see it ‘working’, is that the prosperity folks look like Westerners. Westerners often like their churches – they use English, they wear Western clothes, they have the right talk – so they get masses of Western money. Kisumu Pentecostal church in Kenya, for example, that is about to host a large prosperity rally, is an amazing construction – and don’t say it wasn’t built with the help of Western money. This phenomenon can be ‘blamed’ in part on donors who ‘give’ to what ‘looks right’ without checking its foundations.

5. While we could say prosperity leaders are ‘greedy’. For them, often, they are only trying to catch up with Americans. If they aren’t ‘catching up’, then neither can they benefit from the latter. That is, related to number 4 above, when a wealthy American (or non-American of course) visits Africa, he expects to be picked up at the airport by a decent car, addressed in decent English, taken to a decent place to stay and given decent (i.e. American style) food etc., then he’ll leave his decent cheque. Those who aren’t prospering don’t prosper, as they can’t entertain the wealthy visitors … etc. Money makes money, as they say.

6. At root of the prosperity Gospel in Africa, is in many ways the propensity for Westerners to ‘give and give and give and give to Africa’. We need to re-check the 1974 Lausanne authority given for ‘social works’ to be considered ‘Gospel’. The Gospel, as you point out, is not about giving money at all … but these days it seems that way. What do the ‘big donors’, the world visions, tear funds, compassion projects etc. have to say?


06.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 1 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Femi_Adeleye (1)   
Ghana
@ Jim_Harries:

Hi Jim,Thanks you for your comments. I’m sorry for not responding earlier (I’ve been travelling). Some comments on your feedback:


 1.In my reference to ‘perceived enemies’ it may not necessarily be witches but could be other people, demons or other things. An enemy can be anything or anyone perceived to be an obstacle to one’s progress. I don’t think its right to say ‘much that much African churchmanship is about tackling witches and witchcraft’. In various parts of Africa, there is authentic churchmanship, having little or nothing to do with witches and witchcraft, rooted in Biblical faith that affirms the Lordship of Christ over all of life. Many African Christians indeed believe that wealth comes from disciplined hard work with little or no reference to ‘witches and ghosts’. The emphasis on enemies being responsible for lack of progress is therefore not necessarily representative of African Churchmanship or Christianity.


 2. In saying that I hope we recognise that there was a higher purpose for ‘the Temple’ and there were people faithful to that purpose.


 3. I must say I don’t share this view at all as it is not representative of all of Africa. There is much more that can be said about ancestors than space would allow here. While ancestors and funerals have their place on the continent, they are not central to church life and to sanctify the ‘prosperity gospel’ as a way of reconnecting with ancestors to ask for wealth could be an abomination.  Most African contexts would affirm that their ancestors do not tolerate laziness or shortcuts to wealth. While the ‘prosperity gospel’ seeks affinity with many things African it actually negates many aspects of African values.


 4. Well, in a sense it works for those ripping off other people, not for ordinary folks waiting for ‘their miracle.’ You are right in saying it looks Western. The very root of the ‘prosperity gospel’ is western. (I’ve traced this in other write ups.) Having said that, it also has an African face in many contexts.


 5. Oh really? –perhaps in most cases.


 6. Don’t let us forget that Westerners also take a much out of Africa-they’re not just giving. Some would argue that affluent western nations live on the back of unjust trade laws and inadequate wages for many labourers in hidden corners of the non-western world. I will differentiate between the ethos of the prosperity gospel and the agencies you’ve referred to.


25.08.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 1 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down David_Allen_Bledsoe (3)  
Brazil

Bro. Femi,

Grace and peace!

I benefited from your advance paper. I attach what I gleaned and a few insights from my context in the document attached.

Downloadable Attachments


27.07.2010
PhContributeBy
Reply Flag 0 Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Femi_Adeleye (1)   
Ghana
@ David_Allen_Bledsoe:

Dear brother David,


Thank you so much for your response to my paper. I’m sorry to be responding lately. I have been travelling. I have read your detailed comments in the attachment and appreciate your insight. Brazil and Africa shares many things in common and your pastors and Bishops are very much like ours. I pray we can find ways of reaching those affected and helping them to be more Biblical in doctrine and lifestyle. Thank you.-Femi


25.08.2010

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you don’t have an account, you can sign up now (it’s free and easy!).

Reach Map and Statistics

 

Views: 14945
Comments: 31
Recommendations: 3

One Click To Action

Connect me with people interested in this resource:

Join related conversations

Generosity and resource mobilization books and booklets
Generosity and resource mobilization books and booklets
By Sas_Conradie

Generosity resources bibliography
Generosity resources bibliography
By Sas_Conradie

Faith-Reliance and Inter-Dependence - an overview
Faith-Reliance and Inter-Dependence - an overview
By Sas_Conradie

 

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | The Lausanne Global Conversation is powered by World Wide Open | What is World Wide Open?