To facilitate a truly global conversation, we ask Christian leaders from around the world to respond to the Global Conversation’s lead articles. These points of view do not necessarily represent the Lausanne Movement. They are designed to stimulate discussion from all points of the compass and from different segments of the Christian community. Please add your perspective by posting a comment so that we can learn and grow together in the unity of the Spirit.

A response to Sadiri Joy Tira’s "The Diaspora Dollar" 

Dr. Tira has aptly highlighted the relative prosperity of many people living in diaspora in comparison to those who are “back home”, which could potentially represent a significant, strategic source of funding for Kingdom ministry - in their homeland, where they currently live or in other segments of their diaspora.  I have observed some factors that can greatly hinder the full realization of that impressive potential.

1. In some regions that are both hotbeds for short-term missionary activity and magnets for “people on the move” from a diversity of ethnic minorities (like is the case in the northern border fringe of Mexico), the way these ministry efforts are carried out may have some unfortunate unintended consequences.  An unhealthy dependency can easily develop, and people who get initiated in the faith in such a context often fall into a pattern of seeing themselves as needy beneficiaries of missionary efforts and not the potential protagonists of and contributors to Kingdom work as God sees them.
2. Where members of a variety of different people groups speaking distinct native tongues have migrated to the same area, churches tend to me multicultural and function in the national language or a common trade language, which limits their depth of understanding of biblical teaching, including instruction on Christian stewardship. Often the church leaders are from the majority culture and are not aware of the full extent of the ethnic diversity around them, and likely do not know the specific ethnicity of their individual parishioners, much less be informed on the status of reachedness of each of the people groups represented among their membership.  Thus, many opportunities where Christians from unreached people groups living in diaspora could be encouraged and mentored by their church leaders to become strategic channels for communicating the Gospel to their people are missed, because the people group issue is simply not on the leaders’ radar screen.
3. For some diasporas, Dr. Tira’s question regarding whether partnerships are being fostered between the homeland church and the diaspora church does not yet apply, because, sadly, no churches have yet been birthed in their place of origin.

In areas receiving “people on the move” much mobilization work is yet needed to awaken the established Christian community to the incredible opportunities God has brought to their doorstep, and to equip them to in turn disciple and equip those becoming followers of Jesus from within the diasporas.  Such discipleship includes the challenge to invest their time and resources in advancing God’s Kingdom.